Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Policy Debates in the American Media

Nothing has driven home to me the reality that the news media in America is liberally biased more than this video from the Piers Morgan show.  Notice first that, though Ryan Anderson has been invited to speak on the show, he has been seated in the audience, instead of onstage.  Second, notice the fact that Piers Morgan and Suze Orman essentially tag-team throughout the show, using unprofessional language and hollow arguments, switching topics, and finally polling a very specific niche of people (the live studio audience) in order to determine what the American public at large believes.


How can anyone hold an honest discussion in such a circumstance?  I am very far from shy about expressing my views in debates and discussions on anything from gun control to welfare to homosexual marriage--in fact, I am often too vocal about my views--but when the general attitude of the modern American media is disdain and disgust for my perspective, I would hesitate to place myself in a position to be ridiculed, especially when doing so would accomplish absolutely nothing.

To Suze Orman, I would say this: do not call someone ignorant when you yourself do not know the facts.  Ryan T. Anderson, according to his bio on the Heritage Foundation website, "received his bachelor of arts degree from Princeton University, graduating Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude.  He is a doctoral candidate in political philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, where he received his master's degree.  His research spans the natural law tradition in conversation with classical and contemporary liberalism."  This man clearly has a very good idea what he is saying, and is not uninformed.  His ideals do not come from assumptions and presuppositions, but from very careful study, and I assure you that his traditional view of marriage was more than tested during his time at Princeton.

To Piers Morgan, I would say this: you call yourself a journalist and newsman.  Whatever happened to reporting without bias?  You have two guests on your show: whatever your personal beliefs, please do not bash one while helping the other.  We all know you are a liberal, both politically and socially, but you do not need to step in and interfere in a discussion between two educated and successful Americans.  I know this is the way talk shows tend to work today (believe me, I wish Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity would also stay out of discussions between their guests), but I would be able to better respect you if you were man enough to rise above the norm and pretend for a few minutes to be unbiased.

Additionally, Mr. Morgan, I would advise you to be very careful.  According to Gallup polls, it was only in 2011 that the percentage of Americans who oppose gay marriage first dropped below 50%.  Over the past three years, 45-48% of Americans oppose gay marriage.  In your summarizing statement in this video, though you may have intended only to insult Mr. Anderson by calling him un-American, you insulted nearly half the population of the United States.  In other words, you just said that over one hundred forty-one million American citizens, most of whom love their country and desire only its future prosperity, do not deserve to be called Americans.

I am one of those Americans, and although I am willing to say it in person or over the internet, I recognize the trend in the American news.  It is time to acknowledge the truth: free speech, though legally protected, is no longer culturally tolerated.  Honest discussions on equal footing do not exist anymore, and those who disagree with the media are in for a rough ride.  Reporters and journalists can no longer be relied upon to do anything other than push the agendas of highly specialized classes.

As for politics?  Constitutionality does not matter anymore.  Newsmen obviously no longer care whether or not the national government can legally do something.  They want what will give them the greatest benefits, and hang the Constitution!  These are the beliefs that are being pumped into millions of homes across America, being displayed in televisions in restaurants and hotels throughout this land, and being fed into the minds of our fellow citizens.  We are not being taught to think rationally or morally.  Instead, we are being taught to fight for our "right" to comfort and ease; any of the 870,000,000 people who do not have enough to eat could tell us that this so-called right is a myth, yet we are being told, day-in and day-out, to look out for number one.

Anyone else think it might be time to unplug the cable?

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Worth Mimicking


A long time ago, long before you or I were either born, before our families were around, even before any of the countries our families came from were around, God created a masterpiece. But this wasn’t one of those masterpieces that was just set out there for generations to appreciate, one of those creations that people are like, “Oh, wow, that guy was really something, wasn’t he? Wish he were still around: there are a few questions I’d ask him if he were.”

No, this is a masterpiece that continues to, well, continue. It grows, adapting to the times, forming itself around new cultural phenomena, integrating itself into any environment, responding to any need that should arise. It’s like a book that writes its own sequels, film adaptations, soundtracks… And it can do this because it’s not just one story, but many; it’s not only about one person, or even about several. It’s about everybody: every individual who has ever lived, every culture those individuals have lived in, every civilization in which those cultures have been present, every history those civilizations have helped to form.

You see, in the beginning, God did what no one else can do: He had original thought. And what He came up with was, indeed, miraculous. Because He invented something that was like Himself, but was still different. Made in His image, yet still its own individual. What kind of genius must He be, to come up with the creature who has come up with all of the so-called “progress” we see today? I would like to propose that the greatest asset of mankind, the thing that truly lends us God’s image—because it can’t be appearance or personality except in a very general sense, because God has created each and every person individually, and none of us are exactly the same—is our ability to create.

God gave us His own aptitude for dreaming, for designing, for building, for repairing, for improving. That is built into us in the same way that our hair colour or our height or our intelligence is built into us. I have it, you have it, our friends, our families, each and every person has that divine spark of genius, captured inside a physical frame. We can create! And that is beautiful.

If that is true, though, why can’t I go out one day and design a skyscraper? Why can’t you sit down for a few hours and type up a novel? Did the Master Creator build a flaw into our hardware? The answer is both yes and no. Of course, God didn’t make us wrong, because He’s perfect, and so His creation was perfect at the time of its completion. But when God set out to design a creature to rule over the earth He was building, He didn’t just want robotic caretakers to herd sheep for Him. No, God wanted something, someone who would please Him through its very life. And so He added just a little bit of spice to the plans: a tiny tweak in the design, hardly a huge change at all. And yet free will made us who we are today.

Now, don’t panic—I’m not going to cover such a heavy and controversial topic today. If theologians have wrestled with the subject of free will versus predestination for centuries, probably millennia, who am I to tackle it when I’m not even out of high school? But I do want you to understand that the course of human history has proceeded the way it has because, in some capacity, God instilled in us the ability, and desire, to make choices. We were not created to totally run our own lives, for we still need a Sovereign in our lives, but we were built to be somewhat independent. Every parent can understand this: who wants to watch his kid every moment of every day to make sure they do everything right? No one! And that’s why you train and instruct, preparing your children for the day when they can have more independence. God gave us the ability to make our own decisions because He genuinely wants to have a relationship with us, and that doesn’t mean pulling puppet strings all the time. When I was younger, I gave each of my stuffed animals different personalities. I’d talk to them, and they’d reply; but the only problem was that I was the one replying. True, I could imagine that they were answering, but the words that came out of their mouths were my words, and not theirs. And that’s why, as I got older, the toys went into the box and I sought out real people, who would give me real answers: original ones that they actually thought up.

And so God made the fateful decision to give us free will, knowing full well, I believe, the consequences of that decision. Looking forward and seeing the pain that our choices would cause Him, He still chose to give us free will, why? Because He already knew who every one of us would be, and He loved us and wanted to be in a relationship with us.

So here was this masterpiece called man, living in the garden with this masterpiece called woman. Both of them were perfect, flawless, able to talk with God and with each other, able to invent names for these funny, wacky things God had made: things like the platypus, the giraffe, the bumblebee. And God saw that they were very good. He was proud of His creations! And I believe He was glad to have that time in the garden with them. He saw what was going to happen, but I’m sure He enjoyed the time with the man and the woman while He had it.

I don’t know how long that first chapter of humanity lasted, when everything in the design was working perfectly: the Bible gives no indicator of time, it just launches straight into the tragedy. At this point in the story, a new character is introduced. Universally viewed as the villain of the story (and rightfully so), the serpent was more crafty than any other. But we mustn’t say, “Oh no, poor Adam and Eve! They were deceived!” That is not what happened. The man and the woman were aware of the rule, aware of the requirements set before them. And what easy requirements! Don’t eat this fruit. I mean, come on! But God had put that free will in them, and they decided they wanted that fruit anyway. Notice I said that they decided to want the fruit; they didn’t just want the fruit, they chose to want it. Genesis 3:6 says, “When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.” The woman looked at the fruit and decided that it was something she wanted. Certainly, the serpent’s speech was the impetus for that decision, but the choice was still on her shoulders. She took the fruit and ate it. And what of the man? For him, the blame is doubled. First, he was with her when she took the fruit, and decided to say nothing. That’s choice number one. Second, she gave the fruit to him, and he decided to eat it. That’s choice number two. Together, they made three wrong decisions in a span of about one minute, maybe a bit longer.

Well, you know the rest of that chapter of our history: God comes, there’s lots of finger-pointing (again, poor decisions), and they face the consequences for their decisions. But there were a few things that happened in the background, even before the close of Part One. With free will came the capacity to choose evil. When they chose to eat the fruit, they chose evil for the first time, and immediately that capacity to choose evil shot up about seventeen thousand points, which is why we feel the effects of sin today: we were born with an incredibly high capacity for wrong decisions. That’s the first thing that happened.

The second thing that happened—and this is the one I want to focus on—is that the creative capabilities of the human being were broken. This is a result of the fruit’s effects. Before we possessed the knowledge of good and evil, there was just life. When the only evil we could commit was to learn the difference between good and evil, we could not sin, and so we lived in complete innocence. Everything we created was pure and holy, blameless in God’s eyes, and thus perfect. But once we learned the difference between good and evil, those days were over. When you know about evil, it is impossible to create something that does not reflect that, if only in a miniscule way. And that, God cannot abide.

But knowledge of evil is not the only way in which our creative capabilities were broken. The innocence of what we created was lost, but so was the originality. If you look out there, at the world around us, what is it we have created? Shades and echoes, moving mirrors, reflections of things that are not ours. Our entire world is plagiarized! We have vehicles that are our attempts to create something that can travel, but none of them can move half as well as any of the creatures God crafted. We have buildings that are our attempts to create homes, but can even one of them compete with the garden God made for our original home? We have artificial lights and artificial plants, artificial turf, artificial animals, even artificial bodies, and not one of them can compare with the real thing.

Even our entertainment is pitiful. Look at any book, any play, any movie. What are the common themes? Hmm… Sacrifice? God’s plan for our salvation. Maybe love? The reason, painted all over God’s book, that He created us in the first place. How about hate? God states flatly that He hates unrighteousness. All of our visual art is, once again, a reflection of things we see in real life. Music is, perhaps, the only art form mostly free from sin’s corrupting influence. I’m not talking about songs with words, those are all about love, longing, despair, or living life for fun. I mean purely instrumental music: classical, innovative, score. But even those reek of sorrow.

I find it so tragic that, through our own stupidity, we spoiled what is possibly God’s greatest gift to us after Himself. Could you imagine if we lived in a world where every book was a celebration of beauty? What about a world where Hollywood's output included something other than sex, drugs, and violence? Where every songwriter's work didn't praise the depravity of sin?

Now, please do not think that I am so pessimistic as to be unable to see the good in our artwork. I believe that there is very real beauty and joy to be seen, very real pleasure to be had, from art of every kind. But I wanted to first highlight the negative sides of what passes for creativity so that the positive sides can shine out a bit brighter.

Yes, there are delightful times to be had from reading books; I love watching movies just as much as the next person. Music is extraordinarily moving to listen to. We as a general populace have done an incredible job of overcoming some of our own natural destructiveness in order to instead create, or at least mimic. The purpose of this paper is not to applaud humanity, though; neither is it to bash us in some way. I only wish to point out how unbelievable is the grace our God has given us.

Just think about this: how many people exist who have created beautiful artistic expressions, yet are not Christian? In this, God does not discriminate between His children and those who are His enemies. He allows even those who most spitefully defy Him to be blessed with the gifts of creativity and imagination. That is beyond belief: how many of us would choose to give those who most hate us one of our most precious possessions? No one.

If you think you don't owe God anything, think again. Even if you don't choose to follow Him, offer up a quick prayer of thanks, right now, for the incredible capacity He has given you to bring beauty into this world. And now do not feel anymore pressure to perform. You will never measure up to a standard of perfection, so relax and enjoy the experience of mimicking your Creator's passion: creation.

Spontaneity? Rather Not...

I just got the urge to blog.  It just sorta hit me out of nowhere.  The only problem with this urge is that I have absolutely no idea what it is I want to blog about.  It seems very silly--a writer who doesn't know what to write--but then again, there is no central theme involved in this blog.  It's not like I've said, "Alright, I'm going to be a blogger on industrial developments in third-world countries."  It isn't even like I've said, "I love flowers, so I'm going to make every blog post focus on a different type of flower."  No, instead I had to go ahead and say, "Hey, let's write about whatever pops into my head!"

Sometimes spontaneity is the enemy of productivity--a lesson I have finally begun to learn from my fiction writing.  In terms of accomplishing something through writing, it never happens without planning.  I can get pretty far just running off spontaneous inspiration, but I dry up after about fifty pages of single-spaced writing.  That isn't a good trait for a writer.  I'm slowly learning to plot and outline before I actually begin writing a project, so that I can prevail to the end of the story.

Here's the thing: life doesn't work if we don't think about it before we live it.  Think of it as a marathon: there are lots of people who can do a sprint, no problem, or even a 5-K, but there's no way on earth any of them could go out and run a marathon without some serious preparation.  It's the same thing with life, because life is a marathon.

In the Bible, God used Paul to make the same point (1 Corinthians 9).  A lot of people use this passage, and other parallel ones, to talk about prevailing and persevering when the going gets tough.  I think that is a wonderful application of this passage, and it has gotten me through a lot of really tough emotional and spiritual situations for me.  I think the error comes when that is the only way people use it, because there are always multiple applications for a verse in the Bible.

God is telling us not just to persevere in life, but also to prepare for life.  I guarantee that you will never regret any actions so much as ones you take without forethought.  That's not to say that spontaneity won't sometimes pay off, even in significant and beautiful ways that change our lives, but those times are the exception rather than the rule.  It is essential to recognize that we should prepare for life in the same way we would prepare for an essential work or school project, for life is the biggest project we've been entrusted with completing.  Think and pray before you make a significant decision about friendships, careers, or education.  In taking the time for this sort of preparation, you'll find yourself with a lot less stress in your day-to-day life.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Conclusion

There are those who believe it is impossible to know the truth.  The irony of such a statement is that they believe that it is true.  Everyone believes in something, and everyone ought to believe that their beliefs are true.  How, then, can we know the truth?  If I disagree with a Marxist but we both think our beliefs are true, who is right?  We cannot know that.  That is not to say that we cannot know the truth: the truth is knowable, it is simply impossible to know which belief system is true.

I believe that one day I will die and will stand before the God Who created me and give an account for all of my actions.  A friend of mine who is an atheist believes that one day he will die and will be dead.  We cannot know which of us is right until we die.  That is the life of faith.  A worldview is nothing more than looking at the world and choosing what makes sense, analyzing the evidence and honestly choosing what seems true, then living your life with the assumption that what you believe is true, is true.

I believe that my beliefs are true.  Do you?